Showing 1 - 10 of 36
Although deregulation leads to changes in the duties of boards of directors, little is known about changes in their incentives. U.S. banking deregulation and associated changes during the 1990s lends itself to a natural experiment. These industry shocks forced bank directors to face expanded...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005781564
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) was aimed at enhancing corporate governance, financial reporting, and audit functions. This study compares the market reaction of firms with weak and strong protection of shareholder rights to the passage of SOX. We find that firms with weak shareholder...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005394560
We examine the impact of venture capitalist (VC) involvement, quality and exit on corporate governance structures at the time of and subsequent to an initial public offering (IPO). Venture capital backed firms utilize governance structures with greater levels of monitoring at the time of an IPO...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005077752
The board independence requirements enacted in conjunction with the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) provided motivation for firms that were already compliant with the regulations to alter their board structure. We consider actual board changes made by compliant firms and how such changes affect...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010744373
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010889595
We examine whether firms utilize governance systems and increased monitoring mechanisms when information asymmetry and managerial discretion are limited. Given that such monitoring is costly, we expect regulated firms to use less monitoring if regulation substitutes for governance. Using data...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008864688
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011760955
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012035002
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012819476
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014472034