Showing 1 - 10 of 24
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011701731
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012589458
Metric rationalization of social decision rules has been intensively investigated when the social outcome is a nonempty subset of alternatives. The present paper proposes a similar framework for social welfare functions (SWFs)—that is when each social outcome is a ranking of alternatives. A...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011117955
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011815965
In this paper we define manipulation with restricted beliefs as the possibility for some voter to have an insincere preference ordering that dominates the sincere one within the given individual beliefs over other agents' preferences. We then show that all non-dictatorial voting schemes are...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005388198
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005276231
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005175435
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005388368
Arrow’s theorem [1963] states that a social welfare function (SWF) that simultaneously satis.es completeness, transitivity, independence of irrelevant alternatives (IIA) and Pareto principle is necessarily dictatorial in the sense that the social decision on any pair of candidates coincides...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010852224
A Condorcet social choice procedure elects the candidate that beats every other candidate under simple majority when such a candidate exists. The reinforcement axiom roughly states that given two groups of individuals, if these two groups select the same alternative, then this alternative must...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010848206