Showing 1 - 10 of 54
This paper presents a new method to validate risk models: the Risk Map. This method jointly accounts for the number and the magnitude of extreme losses and graphically summarizes all information about the performance of a risk model. It relies on the concept of a super exception, which is...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010738291
We derive several popular systemic risk measures in a common framework and show that they can be expressed as transformations of market risk measures (e.g., beta). We also derive conditions under which the different measures lead to similar rankings of systemically important financial...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010497204
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010728240
This paper proposes a new duration-based backtesting procedure for value-at-risk (VaR) forecasts. The GMM test framework proposed by Bontemps (2006) to test for the distributional assumption (i.e., the geometric distribution) is applied to the case of the VaR forecasts validity. Using simple...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009148709
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011580273
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015359488
We review the extensive literature on systemic risk and connect it to the current regulatory debate. While we take stock of the achievements of this rapidly growing field, we identify a gap between two main approaches. The first one studies different sources of systemic risk in isolation, uses...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010505159
As most Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) engage in securities lending or are based on total return swaps, they expose their investors to counterparty risk. In this paper, we estimate empirically such risk exposures for a sample of physical and swap-based funds. We find that counterparty risk...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010501288
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011456461
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011778571