Showing 1 - 10 of 43
The paper considers what can be inferred about experimental subjects’ time preferences for consumption from responses to laboratory tasks involving tradeoffs between sums of money at different dates, if subjects can reschedule consumption spending relative to income in external capital...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005678715
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011823152
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014426572
The discovered preference hypothesis appears to insulate expected utility theory (EU) from disconfirming experimental evidence. It asserts that individuals have coherent underlying preferences, which experiments may not reveal unless subjects have adequate opportunities and incentives to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005496150
<Para ID="Par1">Recent research invokes preference imprecision to explain violations of individual decision theory. While these inquiries are suggestive, the nature and significance of such imprecision remain poorly understood. We explore three questions using a new measurement tool in an experimental...</para>
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011241816
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010865769
The random lottery incentive system is widely used in experimental economics to motivate subjects. This paper investigates its validity. It reports three experiments which compare responses given to decision tasks which are embedded in random lottery designs with responses in 'single choice'...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005711671
This paper distinguishes the base domain of an economic theory (in which predictions are relatively unambiguous) from, respectively, the domains of intended application and of legitimate testing; it argues that the domain of legitimate testing is not generally restricted to that of intended...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005282285
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009215359
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009150274