Showing 1 - 10 of 32
We provide a ‘how to’ guide to undertake systematic reviews of effects in international development, by which we mean, synthesis of literature relating to the effectiveness of particular development interventions. Our remit includes determining the review's questions and scope, literature...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010619934
Systematic reviews and meta-analysis have risen in popularity in international development to provide evidence on 'what works'. This paper reports the findings of a meta-analysis to assess the impact of microcredit on women's control over household spending to illustrate the challenges of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010824568
There is a growing demand for replications of authoritative works in development studies, which reflects recent trends in other social sciences as well as challenges to important quantitative works in development studies where replications have made contested contributions to understanding. At...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010894056
We reply to the discussion and criticisms of Matthieu Chemin (MC) and Mark Pitt (MP) to our paper ((Duvendack and Palmer-Jones (DPJ)) (all this issue). MC clarifies many issues which now make replication pure probable (but not yet achieved), and MP identifies a number of problems with DPJ (some...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010974844
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009279837
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009279856
Recently, microfinance has come under increasing criticism raising questions of the validity of iconic studies which have justified it, such as Pitt and Khandker. Chemin applied propensity score matching to the Pitt and Khandker data, finding different impacts, but does not disaggregate by...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010692596
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014374844
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011782620
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011789471