Showing 1 - 10 of 21
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012307611
In the 1950s, when development as a subject for study was as yet poorly defined, misunderstandings were not uncommon. The grounds were often methodological, but substantive analytical differences were also involved. I focus on an unusual context, the invitation given to one economist, Hollis B....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015365567
Treating markets as arenas where relative advantage is contested, this entry explores the emergence and evolution of Western markets for paintings, 1450-1750, in terms of the players, their creative moves to secure gain, and the rules they devised to maintain order. Primary markets for paintings...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005388417
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005052767
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005757430
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005447524
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005135581
Treating markets as arenas where relative advantage is contested, this entry explores the emergence and evolution of Western markets for paintings, 1450–1750, in terms of the players, their creative moves to secure gain, and the rules they devised to maintain order. Primary markets for...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014023826
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015388328
Visualization in economics was common, and in trade theory almost a primary mode of analysis and demonstration from the late 19th century until the 1960s. Why? This paper presents two versions of the gains from trade notion that have come to us in visual form, one due to Marshall, the other to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005505410