Showing 1 - 10 of 11
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013465516
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012038921
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012875390
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012809439
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is twofold. The first is to estimate the correlation between market activity and volatility on an exchange that does not use continuous auctions to find prices. The second is to estimate the sensitivity of that relationship to differences in opinions across...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014667076
Using nutritional information of food items acquired by each household, we evaluate how Mexico's nutritional deficiency (calorie and protein) has changed over time. Our extensive dataset combines household surveys from 1984, 1989, 1992, 1996, 2000, 2004, 2006, 2008 and 2010. We find per capita...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010761243
We examine a company's cross-listing decision with a unique sample of unseasoned foreign firms that went public in the U.S. and later cross-listed abroad. We find that these firms are motivated by their pursuit of global growth opportunities in both the capital and product markets. They...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10004987883
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is twofold. The first is to estimate the correlation between market activity and volatility on an exchange that does not use continuous auctions to find prices. The second is to estimate the sensitivity of that relationship to differences in opinions across...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10004998372
We examine sources of improvement in the information environment of foreign firms that cross-listed in the United States as American Depositary Receipts (ADRs) between 1995 and 2005. We analyze changes in the number and dispersion of analyst recommendations on foreign firms following their...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008869369
We examine the underpricing of U.S. firms that went public globally (Global IPOs) between 1986 and 2003. Our results suggest that, when compared to their peers that went public at home, U.S. issuers did not enjoy an advantage in issue costs from their global offerings. Their offers experienced...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008871506