Showing 1 - 10 of 71
If missing observations in a panel data set are not missing at random, many widely applied estimators may be inconsistent. In this paper the authors examine empirically several ways to reveal the nature and severity of the selectivity problem due to nonresponse, as well as a number of methods to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005582516
The authors discuss several tests to check for the presence of selectivity bias in estimators based on panel data. One approach to test for selectivity bias is to specify the selection mechanism explicitly and estimate it jointly with the model of interest. Alternatively, one can derive the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005550145
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005122519
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005228717
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005228806
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005286058
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005194310
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013423771
A wide range of empirical biases hampers hedge fund databases. In this paper we focus upon survival-related biases and disentangle look-ahead biases due to self-selection of funds and due to fund termination. Self-selection arises because funds voluntarily report their information to data...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005436421
This paper analyzes the properties of a number of estimators that can be used to estimate short-run persistence in mutual fund returns. When data for different funds are pooled, it is advisable to correct for cross-sectional differences in expected returns. However, these adjustments may induce...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005557088