Showing 1 - 5 of 5
There is strong evidence about a home-court advantage in international portfolio investment. One explanation for the bias is an information asymmetry between domestic and foreign investors about the economic performance of domestic firms. This asymmetry causes two types of distortions: an...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005749902
In this paper we challenge the conventional wisdom that using workfare as a supplementary screening device to means-testing is socially undesirable when the government objective is welfarist, namely, to ensure that all members of society will attain some minimal level of utility. Our argument...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008466470
We consider a model of prejudice-driven discrimination, where the advantaged 'tall' discriminate against the disadvantaged 'short'. We employ an egalitarian social welfare function to compare anti-discrimination legal rules with a non-discriminatory ('height-blind') income tax.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005566823
We survey several key mechanisms that explain the composition of international capital flows: foreign direct investment, foreign portfolio investment and debt flows (bank loans and bonds). In particular, we focus on the following market frictions: asymmetric information in capital markets and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008764539
This paper tests the differential effects of the generosity of the welfare state under free migration and under policy-controlled migration, distinguishing between source developing and developed countries. We utilize free-movement within the EU to examine the free migration regime and compare...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008854764