Showing 1 - 6 of 6
An advantage of cap-and-trade programs over more prescriptive environmental regulation is that compliance flexibility and cost effectiveness can make more stringent emissions reductions politically feasible. However, when markets (versus regulators) determine where emissions occur, it becomes...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010815686
This paper analyzes an emissions trading program that was introduced to reduce smog-causing pollution from large stationary sources. Using variation in state level electricity industry restructuring activity, I identify the effect of economic regulation on pollution permit market outcomes. There...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008542943
US climate policy is unfolding under the Clean Air Act. Mobile source and construction permitting regulations are in place. Most important, EPA and the states will determine the form and stringency of the regulations for power plants. Various approaches would create an implicit price on emitting...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010815721
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005241395
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005573491
Pollution emitted by US manufacturers declined markedly over the past several decades, even as real manufacturing output increased. I first show that most of the decline in US manufacturing pollution has resulted from changing production processes ("technology"), rather than changes in the mix...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008596323