Showing 1 - 10 of 14
The DOJ’s complaint against AT&T evinces an analysis based upon structural inferences rather than rigorous economic analysis of a dynamic, high-tech market. Geoffrey Manne (Int'l Center for Law & Economics) & Joshua Wright (George Mason Univ.).
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009359520
A first principles approach to antitrust analysis is required to guarantee the benefits of competition in the agricultural sector; we discuss three fundamental principles of modern antitrust that, at times, appear to be given short-shrift in the recent debate. Geoffrey Manne, International...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008568161
In the sometimes lengthy period before those changes are incorporated into antitrust doctrine and enforcement decisions, the history of antitrust suggests a tendency toward false positives when innovative business practices are involved.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008587749
While the Court’s rejection of the patent presumption in is worthy of praise, the manner in which the Court reaches this result is worthy of some critical analysis.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008587750
An increasing number of these exclusive dealing cases allege that slotting contracts impair rivals and ultimately harm competition. A theme in these cases appears to be that some form of exclusivity term explicitly limiting rivals’ access to shelf space appears to be a necessary...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008587751
This article examines some deficiencies in the Commission’s arguments in support of review of <em>FTC v. Rambus</em>, concluding that the Supreme Court was correct to deny the petition.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008587753
A sensible consensus view emerged that a necessary condition for anticompetitive harm in an exclusive dealing or de facto exclusive contract is that the contract deprives rivals of the opportunity to compete.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008587754
The handling of cases under the rubrics “monopolization,†“single-firm conduct,†or “abuse of dominance†continues to be debated by the competition policy community.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008547507
The Google Books matter brings to mind the increasing importance in an information-based economy of intellectual propertyâ€â€in this case copyrightâ€â€and the tension many perceive between the exclusivity of IP and the openness of competition.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008547654
Most competition law falls into one of three categories. The first, cartel behavior, is relatively uncontroversial. The basics of the second, horizontal mergers, are generally accepted, but how best to implement itâ€â€efficiency defenses, welfare standards, the need for market...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008547839