Showing 1 - 5 of 5
We test the Kraus-Litzenberger three-moment capital asset pricing model (CAPM) and the Fama-French (FF) three-factor (FF) model with the C-test proposed by Davidson and MacKinnon. We are unable to reject the null hypothesis that expected returns are described by either of the models in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005485261
Based on several research studies and in particular the theoretical study of Prakash et al. (1997), it is known that the variance as well as the skewness of the probability distribution of rates of return increases if the investors-investment interval increases. In the present study, using the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005485172
Based on several research studies and in particular the theoretical study of Prakash et al. (1997), it is known that the variance as well as the skewness of the probability distribution of rates of return increases if the investors' investment interval increases. In the present study, using the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005637790
Critics of Regulation Fair Disclosure (FD) have argued that its enactment would result in not only a decrease in asymmetric information but a decrease in total amount of information disclosed by firms. We investigate this conjecture and find (1) no change in market risk premium, (2) an increase...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009200897
We empirically test and compare the performance of the traditional capital asset pricing model (CAPM), the three-moment CAPM and the Fama-French (FF) three-factor model using the FF 25 portfolios data. Based on the time-series and the cross-sectional tests, the FF three-factor model outperforms...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005452157