Showing 1 - 10 of 572
This paper develops a specification test for the instrument validity conditions in the heterogeneous treatment effect model with a binary treatment and a discrete instrument. A necessary testable implication for the joint restriction of instrument exogeneity and instrument monotonicity is given...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010190476
Currently there is little practical advice on which treatment effect estimator to use when trying to adjust for observable differences. A recent suggestion is to compare the performance of estimators in simulations that somehow mimic the empirical context. Two ways to run such "empirical Monte...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011912535
We extend the Berry, Levinsohn and Pakes (BLP, 1995) random coefficients discrete choice demand model, which underlies much recent empirical work in IO. We add interactive fixed effects in the form of a factor structure on the unobserved product characteristics. The interactive fixed effects can...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010345243
We extend the Berry, Levinsohn and Pakes (BLP, 1995) random coefficients discretechoice demand model, which underlies much recent empirical work in IO. We add interactive fixed effects in the form of a factor structure on the unobserved product characteristics. The interactive fixed effects can...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009521645
We extend the Berry, Levinsohn and Pakes (BLP, 1995) random coeffcients discrete-choice demand model, which underlies much recent empirical work in IO. We add interactive fixed effects in the form of a factor structure on the unobserved product characteristics. The interactive fixed effects can...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011603891
propensity score weighting estimation of the average treatment effects for treated (ATT). The proposed averaging procedures aim …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011309717
Let Y be an outcome of interest, X a vector of treatment measures, and W a vector of pre-treatment control variables. Here X may include (combinations of) continuous, discrete, and/or non-mutually exclusive "treatments". Consider the linear regression of Y onto X in a subpopulation homogenous in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011924562
In many applications of the differences-in-differences (DID) method, the treatment increases more in the treatment group, but some units are also treated in the control group. In such fuzzy designs, a popular estimator of treatment effects is the DID of the outcome divided by the DID of the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011372663
We propose a generalization of the linear quantile regression model to accommodate possibilities afforded by panel data …; Section 2.6). We show that panel data allows the econometrician to (i) introduce dependence between the regressors and the … (NLSY79). Consistent with prior work (e.g., Chamberlain, 1982; Vella and Verbeek, 1998), we find that using panel data to …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010494997
We propose a generalization of the linear quantile regression model to accommodate possibilities afforded by panel data …; Section 2.6). We show that panel data allows the econometrician to (i) introduce dependence between the regressors and the … (NLSY79). Consistent with prior work (e.g., Chamberlain, 1982; Vella and Verbeek, 1998), we find that using panel data to …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011524832