Showing 1 - 10 of 47
) dual incomplete learning, i.e., only a fraction of each type chooses its optimal action. Which one occurs depends on the …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011616579
Depending on the context at hand, people's preference for receiving feedback might differ. Especially in allocation decisions that directly concern another individual, feedback from the affected person can have positive or negative value. We study such preferences in a laboratory experiment by...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012169494
the context of daily life does not differ between the two groups. We therefore conclude that learning through experience …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012103380
conclude that learning effects are more important than selection effects for explaining differences between inexperienced and …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011944119
number of standard learning algorithms. The learning theories are (unbeknown to subjects) a best response process, fictitious … play, imitation, reinforcement learning, and a trial & error process. We test whether subjects try to influence those … and that all learning algorithms are subject to exploitation with the notable exception of imitation. The experiment was …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003379095
by two countervailing forces that we dub 'Precautionary Learning' and 'Research Pessimism'. We find that - contrary to …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011409139
I study liquidity traps in a model where agents have heterogeneous expectations and finite planning horizons. Backward-looking agents base their expectations on past observations, while forward-looking agents have fully rational expectations. Liquidity traps that are fully or partly driven by...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012214926
We propose and experimentally test two tractable methods to incentivize the elicitation of private information: Benchmark and Coordination. Both mechanisms capitalize on the false consensus effect, a well-documented phenomenon that follows Bayesian reasoning. That is, individuals use their own...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012103387
We propose a method to identify the ranking of focal points (Schelling, 1960) on the individual level. By contrast to conventional coordination, where subjects bet on only one alternative, subjects coordinate by the distribution of points. This allows them to invest in multiple alternatives and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011987024
We run an experiment that gives subjects the opportunity to hedge away ambiguity in an Ellsberg-style experiment. Subjects are asked to make two bets on the same draw from an ambiguous urn, with a coin flip deciding which bet is paid. By modifying the timing of the draw, coin flip, and decision,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011616236