Showing 1 - 10 of 23
There is some evidence that, as individuals participate in repeated markets, "anomalies" tend to disappear. One interpretation is that individuals — particularly marginal traders — are learning to act on underlying preferences which satisfy standard assumptions. An alternative...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005099491
Preference reversal is often explained as an information-processing effect, whereby individuals respond differently to valuation problems than to straight choices. Regret theory offers the alternative explanation that individuals act on consistent, but nontransitive, preferences. Regret theory,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005099499
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005072178
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005072352
Much of the experimental evidence concerning violations of von Neumann-Morgenstern expected utility theory has been collected fr om experiments designed with conventional theory in mind and does not provide direct tests of alternative models such as regret theory and disappointment theory. This...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005570622
This article reports experimental tests of two alternative explanations of how players use focal points to select equilibria in one-shot coordination games. Cognitive hierarchy theory explains coordination as the result of common beliefs about players' pre-reflective inclinations towards the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008489617
The common ratio effect is a well-attested violation of expected utility theory. This paper uses four principles of dynamic choice to characterize alternative theoretical strategies for explaining the effect. It reports an experiment which tests these principles and, by implication, several...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005231999
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010826544
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005072227
This paper describes an experiment where respondents were asked to tackle two decision tasks which were very similar in structure but which differed in that one problem involved direct money payoffs while the other involved payoffs in the form of probabilities of winning a given sum of money....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005072354