Showing 1 - 10 of 14
We consider a Lucas asset-pricing model with heterogeneous agents, exogenous labor income, and a finite number of exogenous shocks. Although agents are infinitely lived, endowments and dividends are time-invariant functions of the exogenous shock alone and are thus restricted to lie in a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005370671
There are a wide variety of theoretical general equilibrium models with incomplete security markets. In this paper we give a general recipe for using homotopy algorithm to compute equilibria in these models. In many models, taxes, transaction-costs or other market frictions introduce the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005155368
At a stationary Markov equilibrium of a Markovian economy of overlapping generations, prices at a date-event are determined by the realization of the shock, the distribution of wealth and, with production, the stock of capital. Stationary Markov equilibria may not exist; this is the case with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005155470
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005178703
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008673887
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005370806
We argue that real uncertainty itself causes long-run nominal inflation. Consider an infinite horizon cash-in-advance economy with a representative agent and real uncertainty, modeled by independent, identically distributed endowments. Suppose the central bank fixes the nominal rate of interest....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005371116
Afriat’s original method of proof is restored by using the minmax theorem. Copyright Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010728076
Much of the lending in modern economies is secured by some form of collateral: residential and commercial mortgages and corporate bonds are familiar examples. This paper builds an extension of general equilibrium theory that incorporates durable goods, collateralized securities, and the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010949486
Arrow’s original proof of his impossibility theorem proceeded in two steps: showing the existence of a decisive voter, and then showing that a decisive voter is a dictator. Barbera replaced the decisive voter with the weaker notion of a pivotal voter, thereby shortening the first step, but...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005753294