Showing 1 - 10 of 28
In two previously reported experiments, Graham Loomes, Chris Starmer, and Robert Sugden have found that choices are systematically nontransitive, following a pattern of 'cycling asymmetry' predicted by regret theory. However, there are other potential explanations for these observations. This...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005284416
In this paper, the authors demonstrate that the assumption of "regret aversion," which has been invoked in regret theory to explain several well-documented violations of expected utility theory, also implies the existence of strict preferences between some stochastically equivalent actions and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005195490
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001251756
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001126068
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001348070
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001345996
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002903912
Robbins argues that the fundamental propositions of microeconomic theory are deductions from the assumption that individuals act on consistent preferences; this 'indisputable fact of experience' does not need to be validated in controlled experiments. While recognising that some neoclassical...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008489152
The Harless-Camerer (HC), Hey-Orme (HO), and random preference (RP) models of stochastic variation in choice under uncertainty are compared. Implications of these models, including some that are independent of the deterministic theory with which they are combined, are tested in an experiment in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005284581
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005284670