Showing 1 - 7 of 7
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005269755
We prove that the maximal bid in asymmetric first-price and all-pay auctions is the same for all bidders. Our proof is elementary, and does not require that bidders are risk neutral, or that the distribution functions of their valuations are independent or smooth.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010743703
We consider a battle between two groups D (defenders) and A (attackers). Each group has the same number of agents, but they differ by their abilities. Every agent confronts only one opponent from the other group once in either an all-pay contest or a Tullock contest such that the number of the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010580506
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005355602
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005270357
We study a best-of-three all-pay auction. It is shown that with values of winning and without values of losing, this auction is less productive (the players' total expected effort is smaller) than the one-stage all-pay auction. However, with different values of losing over the contest's stages...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009146120
We find that two-stage contests could be ineffective, namely, there is a higher chance of low-ability players participating (and winning) than high-ability players. However, imposing a fee on the winner can guarantee that the contest will be effective.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008474057