Showing 1 - 10 of 166
Consider a contest for a prize in which each player knows his/her own ability, but may or may not know those of his/her rivals (the complete or incomplete information regimes). Our main result is that, if the value of the prize is high, more effort and output are engendered under incomplete...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010678824
We prove that the maximal bid in asymmetric first-price and all-pay auctions is the same for all bidders. Our proof is elementary, and does not require that bidders are risk neutral, or that the distribution functions of their valuations are independent or smooth.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010743703
-pay contest or a Tullock contest such that the number of the contests is identical to the number of the agents in each group. The … object of group D is to win all the contests in order to survive, or else it will be defeated by group A. We analyze the …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010580506
We establish the effort-maximizing rule of allocating heterogeneous prizes when contestants privately observe their …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011116209
We consider two-player, perfectly discriminatory, common-value contests (or all-pay auctions), in which one player … discriminatory contests in which the uninformed player wins with a strictly greater probability than the informed player. …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011041833
We provide a simple example demonstrating that the unconditional revelation information in a war of attrition with private budget constraints can decrease expected revenue. Our example suggests that information non-revelation can counteract the adverse revenue impact of budget constraints and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010930710
We analyze equilibria of two-player contests where players have intention-based preferences. We find that players …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010678811
When players compete repeatedly, prizes won in earlier contests may improve the players’ abilities in later contests …. This paper determines the allocation of prizes within and across contests that maximizes the (weighted) sum of aggregate …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011041581
We provide extensions of the Bulow and Klemperer (1996) result when the seller has value for the object above the minimum value of the buyers. The result may fail. We show that the seller does better with more participation and some exclusion than the optimal exclusion of buyers of low value...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011263431
We show that the commitment to not allocate may be exploited by a seller/social planner to increase the expected social surplus that can be achieved in the sale of an indivisible unit.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011076536