Showing 1 - 10 of 619
Initiated by the seminal work of Fehr and Fischbacher (Evolution and Human Behavior (2004)), a large body of research has shown that people often take punitive actions towards norm violators even when they are not directly involved in transactions. This paper shows in an experimental setting...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012493242
voting. Using a laboratory experiment to simulate a data-entry organization, we find that, while autocratic decision … examines how changes in the decision-making rights about what workgroup members can do on the job affect cyberloafing and … subsequent work productivity. We compare two different types of decision-making regimes: autocratic decision-making and group …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011383975
We experimentally investigate whether individuals are more likely to engage in dishonest behavior after having experienced unfairness perpetrated by an individual with a salient group identity. Two individuals generate an endowment together, but only one can decide how to share it. They either...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011709208
(regardless of accuracy). A simple lab experiment contradicts both hypotheses - subjects tend to follow public information when it … to the voting decision. These findings are important because the salience of public information is easily manipulable by …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012168608
or being alone. In contrast to previous economic research on group decision-making, we excluded the effects of group … subjects in our experiment were only requested to show their faces to the other members, without further communication …. Moreover, we adopted two collective decision rules, i.e., the median rule and the random rule, which provide the truth …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014420471
We experimentally compare the consequences for group cooperation of two decision mechanisms involving the extension of … group membership. We analyze an exogenous decision (random draw) and an endogenous decision (made by a particular group …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012432443
Weighted committees allow shareholders, party leaders, etc. to wield different numbers of votes or voting weights as they decide between multiple candidates by a given social choice method. We consider committees that apply scoring methods such as plurality, Borda, or antiplurality rule. Many...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012698221
In a model of simultaneous voting, Feddersen and Pesendorfer (1998) consider the possibility that jurors vote strategically, rather than sincerely reflecting their individual information. This results in the counterintuitive result that a jury is more likely to convict the innocent under a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013172468
Individual behavioral differences in humans have been linked to measurable differences in their mental activities, including differences in their implicit motives. In humans, individual differences in the strength of motives such as power, achievement and affiliation have been shown to have a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011384060
Standard equilibrium concepts in game theory find it difficult to explain the empirical evidence from a large number of static games, including the prisoner's dilemma game, the hawk-dove game, voting games, public goods games and oligopoly games. Under uncertainty about what others will do in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011384070