Similar Search Results

Fairness preferences in a bilateral trade experiment

Ciccone, Alice; Rogeberg, Ole; Braaten, Ragnhild Haugli - In: Games 11 (2020) 1/8, pp. 1-17

Is the willingness to make trades influenced by how the total gains from trade are split between the trading partners? We present results from a bilateral trade game (n = 128) where all participants were price-takers and trading pairs faced one of three exogenously imposed trading prices. The...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012168600

Incomplete information about social preferences explains equal division and delay in bargaining

Kohler, Stefan - In: Games 3 (2012) 3, pp. 119-137

Two deviations of alternating-offer bargaining behavior from economic theory are observed together, yet have been studied separately. Players who could secure themselves a large surplus share if bargainers were purely self-interested incompletely exploit their advantage. Delay in agreement...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009754119

Modeling inequity aversion in a dictator game with production

Rodríguez-Lara, Ismael; Moreno-Garrido, Luis - In: Games 3 (2012) 4, pp. 138-149

should only be rewarded for factors under their control. This fairness ideal does not hold subjects responsible for factors …

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009754116

A choice prediction competition for a social preferences in simple extensive form games : an introduction

Ert, Eyal; Erev, Ido; Roth, Alvin E. - In: Games 2 (2011) 3, pp. 257-276

competition experiment. The two experiments use the same methods and subject pool, and examine games randomly selected from the … and the other on predicting the choices of the second mover. The competitions are based on an estimation experiment and a … same distribution. The current introductory paper presents the results of the estimation experiment, and clarifies the …

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009752422

The intuition of punishment : a study of fairness preferences and cognitive ability

Seier, Markus - In: Games 11 (2020) 2/21, pp. 1-25

Can differences in cognitive reflection explain other-regarding behavior? To test this, I use the three-item Cognitive Reflection Task to classify individuals as intuitive or reflective and correlate this measure with choices in three games that each subject participates in. The main sample...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012431890

Fairness and transparency in one-to-many bargaining with complementarity : an experimental study

Mak, Vincent; Zwick, Rami - In: Games 15 (2024) 4, pp. 1-29

We report an experiment designed to study bargaining behavior between one buyer and multiple sellers with … complementarity and how it is influenced by fairness concern and information transparency. We base our setup on a structured … value of the deal approximately half-half with the buyer as a normative fairness benchmark. The buyers, on the other hand …

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015073214

Do I really want to know? : a cognitive dissonance-based explanation of other-regarding behavior

Matthey, Astrid; Regner, Tobias - In: Games 2 (2011) 1, pp. 114-135

explained by avoiding cognitive dissonance as in Konow (2000). Our experiment’s choice data is in line with this approach. In …

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009752432

Introduction to the special issue "pro-sociality and cooperation"

Ghidoni, Riccardo - In: Games 12 (2021) 3, pp. 1-2

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012649172

Patience or fairness? : analyzing social preferences in repeated games

Duffy, John; Muñoz-García, Félix - In: Games 3 (2012) 1, pp. 56-77

one-shot and the infinitely repeated version of the Prisoner’s Dilemma game. We show that fairness concerns operate as a … ”substitute” for time discounting in the infinitely repeated game, as fairness helps sustain cooperation for lower discount … a combination of time and social preferences (fairness). …

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009752853

Fairness preferences in a bilateral trade experiment

Ciccone, Alice; Rogeberg, Ole; Braaten, Ragnhild Haugli - In: Games 11 (2020) 1, pp. 1-17

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012227801