Showing 1 - 10 of 19
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012535254
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012632687
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012535259
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012189182
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012082417
Discrete choice experiments have the advantage that they can study preferences in health care where revealed preference data is not readily available. However, as a substitute for actual observed market led data, the experimental set-up for hypothetical situations must mimic the circumstances...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005440611
Individuals' rationality has been a key issue long debated in Economics. While normative theories establish the way 'rational' consumers should behave, many empirical studies have documented numerous systematic violations of normative principles. This has led some to question the validity of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005442643
Lancsar and Savage argue that current methods of deriving welfare estimates, using discrete choice experiments, are inconsistent with random utility and welfare theory. In this paper I show that this not the case. The general formula proposed by Small and Rosen for estimating welfare, which...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005442719
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011005432
In a recent paper in this journal, Andrew Lloyd reviewed some potential threats to the estimation of health care benefits in monetary terms. Particular emphasis was placed on the extent to which the use of non-compensatory heuristics may distort the results. Although it is useful to be reminded...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005689783