Showing 1 - 10 of 21
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001653800
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001628695
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001643566
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001633197
We highlight the importance of randomisation bias, a situation where the process of participation in a social experiment has been affected by randomisation per se. We illustrate how this has happened in the case of the UK Employment Retention and Advancement (ERA) experiment, in which over one...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009769298
One of the most powerful critiques of the use of randomised experiments in the social sciences is the possibility that individuals might react to the randomisation itself, thereby rendering the causal inference from the experiment irrelevant for policy purposes. In this paper we set out a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010356798
Randomised controlled or clinical trials (RCTs) are generally viewed as the most reliable method to draw causal inference as to the effects of a treatment, as they should guarantee that the individuals being compared differ only in terms of their exposure to the treatment of interest. This...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011580011
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001877967
A significant gap exists in the UK between the employment rate for Ethnic Minorities and that for Whites. From a policy perspective, it is important to know whether this gap is due to differences in the characteristics of White and Ethnic Minority groups (which reduce the employability of Ethnic...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003867493
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001576231