Showing 1 - 5 of 5
Non-rejection of a unit root hypothesis by usual Dickey & Fuller (1979) (DF, hereafter) or Phillips & Perron (1988) (hereafter PP) tests should not be taken as strong evidence in favour of unit root presence. There are less popular, but more powerful, unit root tests that should be employed...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005458437
In recent research, Elliott et al. (1996) have shown the use of local-to-unity detrending via generalized least squares (GLS) to substantially increase the power of the Dickey-Fuller (1979) unit root test. In this paper the relationship between the extent of detrending undertaken, determined by...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005492152
Following Dickey & Fuller (1979) (DF), a stylized approach to the testing of the unit root hypothesis has emerged. Based upon the combined use of the DF test in its augmented t -ratio form and MacKinnon (1991) critical values, the approach has received widespread adoption due to the ease with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005495237
The power properties of the rank-based Dickey-Fuller (DF) unit root test of Granger and Hallman [C. Granger and J. Hallman, Nonlinear transformations of integrated time series, J. Time Ser. Anal. 12 (1991), pp. 207-218] and the range unit root tests of Aparicio et al. [F. Aparicio, A. Escribano,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005639758
Using tests of time reversibility, this paper provides further statistical evidence on the long-standing conjecture in economics concerning the potentially asymmetric behaviour of output over the expansionary and contractionary phases of the business cycle. A particular advantage of this...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009225596