Showing 1 - 8 of 8
Financial economists seem to believe that takeovers are partly motivated by the desire to improve poorly performing firms. However, prior empirical evidence in support of this inefficient management hypothesis is rather weak. We provide a detailed re-examination of this hypothesis in a large...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005407108
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005139069
Miller has analyzed capital structure in the presence of both corporate and personal taxes. The present work investigates the effect of inflation on both interest rates and equity returns when the Miller equilibrium condition is employed in a loanable funds model. Both an interest rate effect...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005407034
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005609741
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008476946
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005243752
This paper examines the use of seven mechanisms to control agency problems between managers and shareholders. These mechanisms are: shareholdings of insiders, institutions, and large blockholders; use of outside directors; debt policy; the managerial labor market; and the market for corporate...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005138968
This paper examines the role of large shareholders in monitoring managers when they propose antitakeover charter amendments. We attempt to distinguish between two competing hypotheses: the “active monitoring hypothesis” and the “passive voting hypothesis.” We find a statistically...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005139066