Showing 1 - 10 of 63
We study how scholar collaboration varies across disciplines in science, social science, arts and humanities and the effects of author collaboration on impact and quality of co-authored papers. Impact is measured with the aid of citations collected by papers, while quality is determined by the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010795070
With the passage of more time from the original date of publication, the measure of the impact of scientific works using subsequent citation counts becomes more accurate. However the measurement of individual and organizational research productivity should ideally refer to a period with closing...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010795139
opportunity to test whether peer review judgements and (article and journal) bibliometric indicators are independent variables and …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010795315
This paper investigates the impact of referee reliability on the quality and efficiency of peer review. We modeled peer review as a process based on knowledge asymmetries and subject to evaluation bias. We tested various levels of referee reliability and different mechanisms of reviewing effort...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010795236
Hirsch [Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569–16572] has proposed the h index as a single-number criterion to evaluate the scientific output of a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010795275
Combining different data sets with information on grant and fellowship applications submitted to two renowned funding agencies, we are able to compare their funding decisions (award and rejection) with scientometric performance indicators across two fields of science (life sciences and social...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010795303
Project funding is an increasingly important mode of research funding. The rationale is that through project funding new fields and new themes can be supported more effectively. Furthermore, project funding improves competition, which is expected to select the better research projects and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010795322
academics; GS disadvantaged researchers in bibliometrics compared to the other two citation database while WoS disadvantaged …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010795323
Peer review serves a gatekeeper role, the final arbiter of what is valued in academia, but is widely criticized in terms of potential biases—particularly in relation to gender. In this substantive-methodological synergy, we demonstrate methodological and multilevel statistical approaches to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011039339
indicators (Journal Actual/Expected Citations, Category Actual/Expected Citations, and Percentile in Subject Area), and a journal … based indicator (Journal Impact Factor). The data set consists of 125 papers published in 2008 and belonging to the subject …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011039446