Showing 1 - 10 of 12
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005542750
In this paper we address the problem of determining whether adding independent risks or subdividing them is a good substitute for insurance. Despite the fact that accepting more i.i.d. risks increases total risk, it is shown that some risk-averse decision makers can rationally reduce their...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005542757
The economic theory of decision making under risk has seen remarkable advances over the 50 years since Pratt’s (1964) characterization of risk aversion under expected utility. We review developments in three key areas to which Louis Eeckhoudt has made significant contributions: (1) increases...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010987821
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005678156
In this paper, we compare the attitude towards current risk of two expected-utility-maximizing investors who are identical except that the first investor will live longer than the second one. It is often suggested that the young investor should take more risks than the old investor. We consider...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005678181
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005678226
In this article, we show how the order of Linear Stochastic Dominance proposed by Gollier (1995) can be applied to situations with dependent risky assets. This order was shown to be the least constrained necessary and sufficient condition to guarantee that all risk-averse agents reduce their...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005809655
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005809660
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005809664
Since Fishburn and Porter (1976), it has been known that a first-order dominant shift in the distribution of random returns of an asset does not necessarily induce a risk-averse decision maker to increase his holdings of that improved asset. To obtain the desired comparative statics result, one...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005809682