Showing 1 - 10 of 21
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005809239
When there is incomplete information on the source of power in a contest, the contestants may divide their lobbying efforts between the potential centers of power, only one of which determines the contests’ winning probabilities. Our analysis focuses on the effect of ambiguity regarding the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005708975
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005674687
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10004999615
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005067931
We examine the factors that improve the candidates’ likelihood of winning an election by drawing on information from campaign resources used by candidates running in the 2002 French parliamentary election. The main effects that we wish to analyze are the candidates’ gender, political...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005674523
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005542609
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010863917
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010864183
This essay provides a formal justification for qualified majority rules. Specifically, within an uncertain dichotomous choice framework, in which individual preferences are identical but actual judgments may differ, special majority rules emerge as decision rules that maximize the probability of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010864666