Showing 1 - 10 of 18
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005542609
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010863917
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010864183
This essay provides a formal justification for qualified majority rules. Specifically, within an uncertain dichotomous choice framework, in which individual preferences are identical but actual judgments may differ, special majority rules emerge as decision rules that maximize the probability of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010864666
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010864818
This essay measures and analyzes for a special class of point-voting schemes (the Borda method, plurality rule and the unrestricted point-voting scheme) sensitivity to preference variation (a simple change in the socially winning alternative resulting from alteration of a single voter's...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010988191
This paper focuses on two properties of points voting schemes: their vulnerability to preference misrepresentation and their potential for preference expression. In the spirit of the seminal work of Buchanan and Tullock [2], this dual criterion might be used for the choice of an optimal points...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010988217
The proposal of an inefficient policy usually stimulates a political struggle between the affected interest groups. The resulting wasteful lobbying activities may reduce welfare, even if the proposed policy is not approved. In this paper we show that sufficient asymmetry in payoffs not only...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005067944
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005809239
When there is incomplete information on the source of power in a contest, the contestants may divide their lobbying efforts between the potential centers of power, only one of which determines the contests’ winning probabilities. Our analysis focuses on the effect of ambiguity regarding the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005708975