Showing 1 - 8 of 8
We investigate refinements of two solutions, the saddle and the weak saddle, defined by Shapley (1964) for two-player zero-sum games. Applied to weak tournaments, the first refinement, the mixed saddle, is unique and gives us a new solution, generally lying between the GETCHA and GOTCHA sets of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005369260
The Gibbard-Satterthwaite Theorem on the manipulability of social-choice rules assumes resoluteness: there are no ties, no multi-member choice sets. Generalizations based on a familiar lottery idea allow ties but assume perfectly shared probabilistic beliefs about their resolution. We prove a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005369469
Hansson (1969) sets forth four conditions satisfied by no generalized social welfare function (GSWF), a mapping from profiles of individual preferences to arbitrary social preference relations. Though transitivity is not imposed on social preferences, one of Hansson's conditions requires that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005596383
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005752971
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005753000
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005753017
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008925127
This paper covers the theory of the uncovered set used in the literatures on tournaments and spatial voting. I discern three main extant definitions, and I introduce two concepts that bound existing sets from above and below: the deep uncovered set and the shallow uncovered set. In a general...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010698293