Showing 1 - 8 of 8
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012027311
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011552584
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010510038
The popular quantile regression estimator of Koenker and Bassett (1978) is biased if there is an additive error term. Approaching this problem as an errors-in-variables problem where the dependent variable suffers from classical measurement error, we present a sieve maximum-likelihood approach...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012479769
The popular quantile regression estimator of Koenker and Bassett (1978) is biased if there is an additive error term. Approaching this problem as an errors-in-variables problem where the dependent variable suffers from classical measurement error, we present a sieve maximum-likelihood approach...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012870552
We present a methodology for estimating the distributional effects of an endogenous treatment that varies at the group level when there are group-level unobservables, a quantile extension of Hausman and Taylor (1981). Because of the presence of group-level unobservables, standard quantile...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013025812
We present a methodology for estimating the distributional effects of an endogenous treatment that varies at the group level when there are group-level unobservables, a quantile extension of Hausman and Taylor (1981). Because of the presence of group-level unobservables, standard quantile...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012457635
We present a methodology for estimating the distributional effects of an endogenous treatment that varies at the group level when there are group-level unobservables, a quantile extension of Hausman and Taylor (1981). Standard quantile regression techniques are inconsistent in this setting, even...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013071528