Showing 1 - 10 of 99
Despite vigorous research on risk communication, little is known about the social forces that drive these choices. Erev, Wallsten, \& Neal (1991) showed that forecasters learn to select verbal or numerical probability estimates as a function of which mode yields on average the larger group...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005773064
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001545778
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009747443
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003497942
We compared the behavior of groups and individuals in a two-person trust game. The first mover in this game, the sender, receives an endowment and can send any part of it to the responder; the amount sent is tripled, and the responder can then return to the sender any portion of the tripled sum....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005866950
Although reciprocity is a key concept in the social sciences, it is still unclear why people engage in costly reciprocation. In this study, physiological and self-report measures were employed to investigate the role of emotions, using the Power-to-Take Game. In this 2-person game, player 1 can...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010261278
Although reciprocity is a key concept in the social sciences, it is still unclear why people engage in costly reciprocation. In this study, physiological and self-report measures were employed to investigate the role of emotions, using the Power-to-Take Game. In this 2-person game, player 1 can...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010325363
We investigate experimentally the underlying motivations and individual dierences with regard to the participation in between-group conflict in nested social dilemmas. In our nested social dilemmas, the collective is divided into two groups, and individuals allocate tokens between a private, a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010369323
Explaining human cooperation in large groups of non-kin is a major challenge to both rational choice theory and the theory of evolution. Recent research suggests that group cooperation can be explained by positing that cooperators can punish non-cooperators or cheaters. The experimental evidence...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010369341
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10004857858