Showing 1 - 10 of 369
We are the first to confirm that sufficient cost convexity in a Stackelberg model generates profitable mergers between two leaders and between two followers. Moreover, the degree of convexity required for leaders to merge is generally far smaller than that required for followers. Most...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005416922
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009269926
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009679155
This paper examines the set of surplus maximizing mergers in a model of mixed oligopoly. The presence of a welfare maximizing public firm reduces the set of mergers for which two private firms can profitably merge. When a public firm and private firm merge, the changes in welfare and profit...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003833539
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003469216
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003631907
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013186451
Returning to the contention that convex costs provide a resolution to the merger paradox, we show that for reasonable degrees of convexity, the minimum market share needed for merger to be profitable remains close to that associated with linear costs. Moreover, convex costs do not eliminate the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014052253
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010007790
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009547736