Showing 1 - 10 of 446
This paper axiomatizes an intertemporal version of multiple-ptiors utility. A central axiom is dynamic consistency, which leads to a recursive structure for utility, to 'rectangular' sets of priors and to prior-by-prior Bayesian updating as the updating rule for such sets of priors. It is argued...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005808194
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001674674
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001846935
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001846937
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001854413
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001854424
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002574148
The Ellsberg paradox suggests that people's behavior is different in risky situations - when they are given objective probabilities - from their behavior in ambiguous situations - when they are not told the odds (as is typical in financial markets). Such behavior is inconsistent with subjective...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013136133
The Ellsberg paradox suggests that people behave differently in risky situations -- when they are given objective probabilities -- than in ambiguous situations when they are not told the odds (as is typical in financial markets). Such behavior is inconsistent with subjective expected utility...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013141267
"The Ellsberg paradox suggests that people behave differently in risky situations -- when they are given objective probabilities -- than in ambiguous situations when they are not told the odds (as is typical in financial markets). Such behavior is inconsistent with subjective expected utility...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003990550