Showing 1 - 10 of 542
The 1920s and 1930s saw the Fed reject a state-of-the-art empirical policy framework for a logically defective one. Consisting of a quantity theoretic analysis of the business cycle, the former framework featured the money stock, price level, and real interest rates as policy indicators. By...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10004994013
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008756741
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10004791956
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10004421175
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10004921489
In this paper the authors estimate the potential benefit of policies that eliminate a small likelihood of economic crises. They define an economic crisis as a Depression-style collapse of economic activity. For the U.S., based on the observed frequency of Depression-like events, the authors...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005512337
The potential benefit of policies that eliminate a small likelihood of economic crises is calculated. An economic crisis is defined as an increase in unemployment of the magnitude observed during the Great Depression. For the U.S., the maximum-likelihood estimate of entering a depression is...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005512367
What caused the worldwide collapse in output from 1929 to 1933? Why was the recovery from the trough of 1933 so protracted for the U.S.? How costly was the decline in terms of welfare? Was the decline preventable? These are some of the questions that have motivated economists to study the Great...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005512374
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005519798
Drawing on recent business cycle research on the Great Depression, we return to an argument we advanced in a 1996 article in the Journal of Monetary conomics - the argument that features of the Hawley-Smoot tariffs could have done more to decrease economic activity than is customarily believed,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005526296