Showing 1 - 10 of 69
When aggregating individual preferences through the majority rule in an n-dimensional spatial voting model, the ‘worst-case’ scenario is a social choice configuration where no political equilibrium exists unless a super-majority rate as high as 1 — 1/(n+1) is adopted. In this paper we...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009493498
In a list exchange (LE), the intended recipient in an incompatible pair receives priority on the deceased donor waitlist (DD-waitlist) after the paired incompatible donor donates a kidney to a DD-waitlist candidate. A non-directed donor’s (ND-D) kidney is usually transplanted directly to a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015243965
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005051388
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000867949
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001603708
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001526532
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003383758
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001370490
When aggregating individual preferences through the majority rule in an n-dimensional spatial voting model, the "worst-case" scenario is a social choice configuration where no political equilibrium exists unless a super majority rate as high as 1-1/n is adopted. In this paper the authors assume...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005011614
In absence of markets for externalities, the authors look for governances and conditions under which majority voting among shareholders is likely to give rise to efficient internalization. The central and natural role played by a governance of stakeholders is underlined and benchmarked.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005011645