Showing 1 - 10 of 72
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013411400
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010147749
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009761198
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009422682
Weinstein and Yildiz (Econometrica, 2007) have shown that only very weak predictions are robust to mispecifications of higher order beliefs. Whenever a type has multiple rationalizable actions, any of these actions is uniquely rationalizable for some arbitrarily close type. Hence, refinements of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011686699
This paper contributes to the research agenda on non-cooperative foundations ofWalrasian Equilibrium. A class of barganing games in which agents bargain over prices and maximum trading con- straints is considered: It is proved that all the Stationary Sub- game Perfect Equilibria of these games...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015217257
Dufwenberg and Kirchsteiger�s (2004) extends Rabin�s (1993) theory of reciprocity in a dynamic sense, introducing a rule of revision for player�s beliefs. The Sequential Reciprocity Equilibrium [SRE] they define can be dynamically inconsistent. In this article it is argued that such...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015217260
Weinstein and Yildiz (Econometrica, 2007) have shown that only very weak predictions are robust to mispecifications of higher order beliefs. Whenever a type has multiple rationalizable actions, any of these actions is uniquely rationalizable for some arbitrarily close type. Hence, refinements of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011599487
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010007702
The majority of results in the literature on general equilibrium are not for an economy (i.e. given an endowment and preferences), but rather, for a set of economies (i.e. a set of endowments given preferences). Therefore, we argue that the most appropriate robustness result requires perturbing...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014046021