Showing 1 - 10 of 90
A greater threat of takeover has two opposing effects on managerial compensation. The competition effect in the market for managers reduces compensation. The risk effect increases compensation by making managers' implicitly deferred compensation and firm-specific human capital less secure. Using...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012790750
This paper examines the use of seven mechanisms to control agency problems between managers and shareholders. These mechanisms are: shareholdings of insiders, institutions, and large blockholders; use of outside directors; debt policy; the managerial labor market; and the market for corporate...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012791393
This paper examines firms' choice of the mix of mechanisms used to reduce agency problems between managers and shareholders. We empirically address two questions. First, is there interdependence between the use of the various quot;control mechanismsquot;? Second, does cross-sectional evidence...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012791858
Should a firm favor insiders (handicap outsiders) when selecting a CEO? One reason to do so is to take advantage of the contest to become CEO as a device for providing current incentives to employees. An important reason not to do so is that this can reduce the ability of future CEOs and, hence,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012735057
If outside directors with backgrounds in politics and in law play a political role, they will be more important on the boards of firms for which politics matters more. We conduct three tests. First, for a sample of manufacturing firms, we find that politically experienced directors are more...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012786982
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002771334
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002189060
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002771344
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002189023
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002189039