Showing 1 - 10 of 42
Reply of the authors of Farris, P., J. Olver, C. De Kluyver. 1989. The relationship between distribution and market share. 107–128 to commentaries Hughes, D. A. 1989. Commentary. 128 and Kruger, M. W., J. Dennerlein, A. Power. 1989. Commentary—Deciphering distribution effects. 129–130.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008787795
This paper develops an aggregate-level model of distribution and market share for frequently purchased, branded consumer goods that is founded in the concepts of “push” and “pull.” The model makes a key distinction between uncompromised and compromised demand as sources of market share....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008789778
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002225358
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002225361
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005429157
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005418410
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005474220
An interactive goal programming approach for assessing scenario probabilities used in long-range forecasting and decision analysis is developed and illustrated using a small numerical example. The method only requires marginal event probability and ordinal or interval first-order conditional...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009208754
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003513498
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10006998005