Showing 1 - 10 of 25
This paper uses both linear and nonlinear causality tests to reexamine the cross-autocorrelation between the returns on large and small firms. Consistent with previous results, we find that large firms lead small firms, but small firm autocorrelation, nonsynchronous trading, or a differential...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012737969
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011197767
This study investigates the relation between petroleum futures spread variability, trading volume, and open interest in an attempt to uncover the source(s) of variability in futures spreads. The study finds that contemporaneous (lagged) volume and open interest provide significant explanation...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011197815
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011198001
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010889592
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010889650
An extension of the Holly and Gardiol (2000) and Baltagi et al. (2009) papers to the two way context, with heteroskedastic and spatially correlated disturbances is considered. One then derives a joint LM test for homoskedasticity and no spatial correlation. In addition, two conditional LM tests...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011056454
ABSTRACTThis paper extends the ‘remarkable property’ of Breusch (Journal of Econometrics 1987; <b>36</b>: 383–389) and Baltagi and Li (Journal of Econometrics 1992; <b>53</b>: 45–51) to the three‐way random components framework. Indeed, like its one‐way and two‐way counterparts, the three‐way random...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011006231
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10006866934
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10006244270