Showing 1 - 10 of 14
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10006894915
Extending on an impossibility result by Baigent [1], it is shown that an anonymous social choice procedure which preserves preference proximity cannot satisfy the weakest possible form of non-imposition.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005147184
In a paper published in 1952, the French mathematician Georges-Théodule Guilbaud has generalized Arrow's impossibility result to the "logical problem of aggregation", thus anticipating the literature on abstract aggregation theory and judgment aggregation. We reconstruct the proof of Guilbaud's...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010738468
Following the recent generalization of social choice in the literature on judgment aggregation, we extend the analysis of freedom of choice from sets of alternatives to sets of opinions. We establish the analogue of the cardinality based freedom of choice measure and suggest an alternative...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010889796
It is well known that the literature on judgement aggregation inherits the impossibility results from the aggregation of preferences that it generalises. This is due to the fact that the typical judgement aggregation problem induces an ultrafilter on the set of individuals. We propose a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010577850
This paper gives a formulation for the condition of preservation of preference proximity which, unlike previous formulations, respects the spirit of anonymity pervading social choice theory. Proximity preservation is however shown to be inconsistent with a very weak condition guaranteeing a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010836066
An impossibility result for completely abstract social aggregation rules is presented. It is shown that non-imposition and a new no-veto property (two properties in the spirit of the Pareto principle and non-dictatorship respectively) are incompatible with an inter-profile consistency condition...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005678326
The trade-off between equity and efficiency is analyzed in a geometric framework for the problem of committee selection, which has recently attracted interest in the social choice literature. It is shown that this trade-off can be maximal in the precise sense of the antipodality of the outcomes...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008869476
In this paper we compare a minisum and a minimax procedure as suggested by Brams et al. for selecting committees from a set of candidates. Using a general geometric framework as developed by Don Saari for preference aggregation, we show that antipodality of a unique maximin and a unique minisum...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010629502
In a paper published in 1952, shortly after publication of Arrow's celebrated impossibility result, the French mathematicien Georges-Théodule Guilbaud has obtained a dictatorship result for the logical problem of aggregation, thus anticipating the literature on abstract aggregation theory and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010603633