Showing 1 - 10 of 172
Fraas and Lutter raise two important points in their comment on Muller and Mendelsohn (2009): How to design policies for sources that yield negative marginal damages? How does statistical uncertainty in the marginal damages affect the trading ratios across emitters? We address both issues in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009492841
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009492875
This study presents a framework to include environmental externalities into a system of national accounts. The paper estimates the air pollution damages for each industry in the United States. An integrated-assessment model quantifies the marginal damages of air pollution emissions for the US...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009246697
This paper argues for efficient environmental regulations that equate the marginal damage of pollution to marginal abatement costs across space. The paper estimates the source-specific marginal damages of air pollution and calculates the welfare gain from making the current sulfur dioxide...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008596315
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10007748759
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010787820
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010940957
This paper develops a model of an optimal regulatory program for greenhouse gases (GHGs) emissions that accommodates the benefits due to reductions of co-pollutants including: sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxides (NOx), volatile organic compounds (VOC), and fine particulate matter (PM2.5)....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010580589
The sulfur dioxide (SO<sub>2</sub>) cap and trade program established in the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments is celebrated for reducing abatement costs ($0.7 to $2.1 billion per year) by allowing emissions allowances to be traded. Unfortunately, places with high marginal costs also tend to have high marginal...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009147067
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009800012