Showing 1 - 10 of 20
The use of GDP growth as an indicator of national progress has many critics. Ahluwalia and Chenery noted that GDP growth places greater weight on the income growth of richer income groups, and proposed distribution-neutral and pro-poor alternatives. More recently, studies by the World Resources...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009468174
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005543697
Economic studies on environmental degradation generally have a narrow focus on per capita income as an explanatory variable, and often fail to distinguish among the various types of environmental quality or damage. This paper addresses both problems by examining the effect of relative equality...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005482708
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005483103
Accounting for environmental damage is relevant to how one measures the extent and severity of inequality and poverty, and the question of ecological distribution - how the costs associated with environmental damage are distributed across the population - is critical. Following Khan’s (1997)...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010733889
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005751821
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005316287
Claims to the inadequacy of GDP growth as an indicator of well-being improvement are widespread. Yet the notion of well-being is very broad, hence difficult to quantify, so alternative indexes (e.g., ISEW, GPI) may also be deficient. This article approaches well-being from a multi-dimensional...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005705381
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005336534
The article corrects for two main shortcomings in conventional economic analyses of environmental change. First is the overemphasis placed on income growth, and general disregard for other socioeconomic factors. Second is economists' often oversimplified view of the environment, where...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005277130