Showing 1 - 10 of 45
This paper tests the hypothesis that negative client stock returns following the revelation that Enron documents had been shredded are attributable to confounding effects as opposed to a loss of Andersen's reputation. We find that a sharp decline in oil prices along with differences in the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005492666
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010728391
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008892920
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008238260
This study examines attention-driven investment decisions using a sample of firms essentially unknown to investors prior to becoming the target of a stock spam campaign. We show that the market reaction to spam varies predictably with the content of the spam message. Spam date returns and volume...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012710684
This paper tests the hypothesis that negative client stock returns following the revelation that Enron documents had been shredded are attributable to confounding effects as opposed to a loss of Andersen's reputation. We find that a sharp decline in oil prices along with a disproportionate share...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012720749
This paper tests the hypothesis that negative client stock returns following the revelation that Enron documents had been shredded are attributable to confounding effects as opposed to a loss of Andersen's reputation. We find that a sharp decline in oil prices along with differences in the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012765626
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10006691024
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005005150
We examine how analysts respond to public information when setting stock recommendations. We model the determinants of analysts' recommendation changes following large stock price movements. We find evidence of an asymmetry following large positive and negative returns. Following large stock...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005140517