Showing 1 - 10 of 76
Contingent-valuation estimates for white-water boating passengers are compared with Likert ratings by river guides. The approach involves asking whether passengers and their guides ordinally rank alternative flows the same. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Contingent...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005468797
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10006496531
In an excellent article from a recent issue of this journal, Sellar, Stoll and Chavas (1985) make a technical error which causes them to misstate their closed-ended estimates of willingness to pay. Truncation of the estimated cummulative distribution function must we made explicit in compution...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009644160
In a recent study, Whitehead (2002) proposes incentive-incompatibility and starting-point-bias tests for iterative willingness-to-pay questions. We show that if restrictions associated with the nature of starting-point bias are not imposed on the ...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008619581
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001917454
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001917462
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001917471
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001917488
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003494512
Two methods for calibrating discrete choice contingent valuation responses – the dichotomous choice with followup certainty question method of Champ et al. (1997) and the multiple bounded method of Welsh and Poe (1998) – are evaluated using data from a field validity comparison of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010921184