Showing 1 - 10 of 45
Following the recent generalization of social choice in the literature on judgment aggregation, we extend the analysis of freedom of choice from sets of alternatives to sets of opinions. We establish the analogue of the cardinality based freedom of choice measure and suggest an alternative...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010889796
In this paper we compare a minisum and a minimax procedure as suggested by Brams et al. for selecting committees from a set of candidates. Using a general geometric framework as developed by Don Saari for preference aggregation, we show that antipodality of a unique maximin and a unique minisum...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010629502
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008515712
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10007600944
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10007378531
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008430002
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010835844
In a paper published in 1952, the French mathematician Georges-Théodule Guilbaud has generalized Arrow's impossibility result to the "logical problem of aggregation", thus anticipating the literature on abstract aggregation theory and judgment aggregation. We reconstruct the proof of Guilbaud's...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010738468
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10006894915
It is well known that the literature on judgement aggregation inherits the impossibility results from the aggregation of preferences that it generalises. This is due to the fact that the typical judgement aggregation problem induces an ultrafilter on the set of individuals. We propose a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010577850