Showing 1 - 10 of 48
In this paper we characterize axiomatically a ranking method that compares positions in hierarchies in terms of the influence that they provide on the evolvement of knowledge. The comparison takes into account the number of direct and indirect subordinates of the positions and is based on the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010580540
Numerous works in the last decade have analyzed the question of how to compare opportunity sets as a way to measure and evaluate individual freedom of choice. This paper defends that, in many contexts, external procedural aspects that are associated to an opportunity set should be taken into...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005788509
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010021568
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005542810
In this paper we argue, inspired by some psychological literature, that choices are the outcome of the interplay of different, potentially conflicting motivations. We propose an axiomatic approach with two motivations, which we assume to be single-peaked over a certain given dimension. We first...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011147872
Recent work by Bossert, Pattanaik and Xu provides axiomatic characterizations of some decision rules for individual decision making under complete uncertainty. This note shows that, in the case of two of these rules, they do not satisfy one of the axioms used for their characterization. A...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005596632
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010539327
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10007162222
In the present paper we consider a situation in which the individual preferences and the social preference relation are intuitionistic fuzzy and study the compatibility between the Pareto principle and Sen’s minimal liberalism condition. A possible factorization of the intuitionistic fuzzy...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005369377
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005374352