Showing 1 - 10 of 20
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10004321578
This paper analyzes the recommendations of common stocks made by the investment newsletters followed by the Hulbert Financial Digest. We conclude that, taken as a whole, the securities that newsletters recommend do not outperform appropriate benchmarks. Our data provide modest evidence that the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005420631
This paper's empirical results indicate that the average effect of antitakeover provisions on subsequent long-term investment is negative. The interpretation of these results depends on whether one thinks that there was too much, too little, or just the right amount of long-term investment prior...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005443126
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005376861
The New York Cotton Exchange (NYCE) imposes price limits on the trading of cotton futures, whereby the price at which cotton futures trade during a day is restricted to a band centered around the previous day's close. However, the NYCE has no such restrictions on the trading of options on cotton...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005387272
This paper's empirical results indicate that the average effect of antitakeover provisions on subsequent long-term investment is negative. The interpretation of these results depends on whether one thinks that there was too much, too little, or just the right amount of long-term investment prior...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005387332
This paper's regression analyses from a sample of 261 firms that adopted 486 antitakeover provisions (supermajority, classified boards, fair-price, reduction in cumulative voting, anti-greenmail and poison pills) in the 1984-1988 period indicate that the negative market reactions to antitakeover...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005387415
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005410612
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10006937961
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005979752