Showing 1 - 10 of 377
The standard LM tests for spatial dependence in linear and panel regressions are derived under the normality and homoskedasticity assumptions of the regression disturbances. Hence, they may not be robust against non-normality or heteroskedasticity of the disturbances. Following Born and Breitung...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010751567
The robustness of the LM tests for spatial error dependence of Burridge (1980) and Born and Breitung (2011) for the linear regression model, and Anselin (1988) and Debarsy and Ertur (2010) for the panel regression model with random or fixed effects are examined. While all tests are...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010598813
The robustness of the LM tests for spatial error dependence of Burridge (1980) for the linear regression model and Anselin (1988) for the panel regression model are examined. While both tests are asymptotically robust against distributional misspecification, their finite sample behavior can be...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008725928
The standard LM tests for spatial dependence in linear and panel regressions are derived under the normality and homoskedasticity assumptions of the regression disturbances. Hence, they may not be robust against non-normality or heteroskedasticity of the disturbances. Following Born and Breitung...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010703151
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010638642
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010181217
This paper proposes a class of nonlinear stochastic volatility models based on the Box-Cox transformation which offers an alternative to the one introduced in Andersen (1994). The proposed class encompasses many parametric stochastic volatility models that have appeared in the literature,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012712174
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005369402
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005374985
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005390577