We consider an expected-utility-maximizing consumer living two periods who can invest in two assets, one of which is risk free. We do not restrict relative risk aversion to be constant. We first examine the effect that a change in the opportunity set in the second period has on the optimal...

In this paper we address the problem of determining whether adding independent risks or subdividing them is a good substitute for insurance. Despite the fact that accepting more i.i.d. risks increases total risk, it is shown that some risk-averse decision makers can rationally reduce their...

We provide a new proof for the optimality of deductible insurance that does not depend on the expected-utility hypothesis. Our model uses only first- and second-degree stochastic dominance arguments.

What are the determinants of the optimal level of effort to reduce the probability of a loss to occur? Whereas most of the literature on this question focused on risk aversion, we show that the concept of prudence (i.e., a positive third derivative of the utility function) is essential to answer...